These days it is honestly rare to find a film that could be considered universally moving. We've reached an age where the box office is dominated by flashy action films, brainless comedies, films that are simple to understand and be entertained by. Even war movies have become something of an entertaining spectacle. Though they often teach a meaningful message, I personally consider many films showing actual war and battle kind of a glorification of war itself. Like it or not, stories and films do effect the way we view the world and specific issues, like the way we regard war. Even though the images you are seeing in these films are horrible and the story may show the negative effects of war or just tell a story from history, there is still something about them that speaks to our fascination with defeating the enemy and being victorious. That doesn't make them bad, it just makes them another form of entertainment.
Grave of the Fireflies is not a war film. There is nothing glorious about it. It is a survival film, something like Roman Polanski's The Pianist in concept. It takes two vulnerable human beings- mere children- and puts them in a situation that they cannot possibly conquer on their own. From the beginning of the film it is clear that they do not meet with a happy ending, as the brother is shown dying. This bleak opening scene sets the stage for the perfect cautionary tale powered by a simple, long understood idea: war breeds suffering. When everything they once knew is destroyed by air raids, Seita and Setsuko find themselves at the mercy of a society that is breaking down. Without parents to guide or provide for them, an extreme weight is put upon the older brother's shoulders. He tries his hardest to be a man, responsible to a fault, and in any other film we may expect his actions to be rewarded in the end. Instead, he gets to watch his sister waste away from malnutrition while under his care. His guilt over her death drives him to give up on his own life. The happy times in their past are contrasted with the hopelessness of the children's current state throughout the film, and themes of fleeting joy followed by despair are always present. The film as a whole paints a perfect portrait of mono no aware. In a way, it honors a sort of beauty that can only be found in misery. That is why we can even stand to watch it, not for entertainment, but rather for its poignant beauty.
Maybe we could stand to be reminded every once and a while what war is really about.
Grave of the Fireflies leaves its audience with a deeply unsettling feeling even after its credits roll. It should; it's the kind of film that reminds us of our humanity, just how weak we are when the world starts to crumble around us. I would go as far as to say it is one of the most important films of all time. Everyone should see it at least once in their lives. The worst thing we could possibly do is forget about the horrors caused by war, regardless of what side we are, were or may be on in the future.
Suffering is universally understood. War is universally hell.
"Look straight at the people you kill. Don't take your eyes off them for a second. And don't ever forget them, because I promise that they won't forget you." - Kimblee, from Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood.
can't argue with Roger Ebert- this is an incredible film
I think I went into watching Harp of Burma with my expectations a little too high. After seeing Grave of the Fireflies several times over my life, I guess was expecting a more depressing war story out of this movie. Harp of Burma is simply a melancholy tale that tells only part of a full story; it tries to get the viewer to see a part of war through the eyes of the soldiers. However, it goes about this in a non-traditional way. Instead of showing the hardships of war, it focuses on its outcome and the effect it can have on the human spirit.
The animation in Harp of Burma was unimpressive and definitely showed its age, but I can understand the story it was trying to tell clearly. At times the artwork was distracting with how silly it was in a story that was trying to be serious, but that has to be overlooked to actually consider the point of this movie. Peace is the point. Mizushima as a character learns to respect peace above all things, not something a soldier is traditionally known for. After he is separated from his troop he is confronted by the reality of the massive death toll that has befallen the Japanese army. The grief that consumes him upon witnessing this tragedy is so great that it overrides his will to return home, or to the soldiers who had once served as his family. He gives up everything he once knew to bring peace to the dead. The fact that he is putting so much of his effort to simply bury corpses is a major statement of his belief. He is genuinely concerned with his fallen comrade's well being in the after life. He works out of a need for peace; since he has seen so much death he feels that he needs to counter it with good, peaceful action and respect for the dead who have been left to rot. It is his way of bringing a sort of justice to the world.
Overall, Harp of Burma is an interesting little story, but it is just that- little. There was nothing spectacular or new about what it was trying to portray, but it does serve as a reminder that we shouldn't take the dead for granted. In a time when real war is so distant to us, it's important to remember to honor those who give their lives in war.
The first time I ever saw Ghost in the Shell was at a homecoming-ditch party at a friend's house a couple years back. After a few hours of anime marathoning we settled on watching this well-known classic.... I ended up falling asleep halfway through. Whether I was just tired or really uninterested, Ghost in the Shell wouldn't be a film I would come to appreciate until later on. It simply looked like another beautifully animated action anime. Upon a second- and full- viewing of the film I realized how much its themes had in common with other great animes I had seen before, like Serial Experiments Lain and even Fullmetal Alchemist, because of the very real, internal issues it deals with. This film takes the idea of questioning the soul, the identity, and the value of being human and examines it on a grand scale.
Ghost in the Shell's futuristic setting seems to be extremely plausible. The fear of machines taking the place of humans is not a new idea, but Ghost in the Shell takes it to a more philosophical level, rather than going the "robots are out to destroy us" route. The real threat in this film lies not in a true "enemy" but within a rapidly advancing society. The character of the Puppet Master is a curious being in itself; it describes itself as a sentient being because it can recognize its own existence, even though it was developed as an artificial being. There is nothing inherently "evil" or "benign" about it, only naturalistic as it acts in order to preserve itself and carry on by merging with Major Kusanagi's ghost.
One thing Ghost in the Shell does that I particularly like is leave the questions it asks open to interpretation. It never tries to fully resolve the Major's identity crisis- whether or not she is human or otherwise- or offer an obvious moral lesson. What it does best is provoking the viewer to question the existence and worth of the ghosts in our own shells. What, exactly, makes something human when you take away the physical wrapping? The film wants to draw awareness to a connection to something within ourselves that technology may be blocking out over time. If we begin to blur the line between human and machine, what consequences will that raise regarding our own identities and self worth? Since mankind is so constantly searching for ways to advance, special care should be taken that we don't lose that connection to the part of ourselves that truly makes us human beings- the soul.
Another anime that questions the relevance of the human soul/the human identity and does it incredibly well is Serial Experiments Lain. You could make an easy connection between Ghost in the Shell and Serial Experiments Lain; both confront the reality of technology's impact on the human "consciousness". In Lain, humans can upload their souls into this internet-like system called The Wired in order to abandon their "imperfect flesh" and further evolve. The main character thinks much like The Major in Ghost in the Shell, often times questioning who she truly is as she finds out more about what lies "within herself"; both stories also involve hackers and the main characters serve as keys to reaching their goals of ultimately bringing together the virtual and material worlds.
I am glad I finally got to finish watching Ghost and the Shell; while it isn't my favorite anime film of all time, it certainly is a landmark in the genre. No self respecting anime fan should go without seeing it, and the deeper questions it asks should not be overlooked.
I have to admit, I couldn't care less about vampires. These days they have been shamelessly overexposed, their legends rehashed over and over again in different settings, different time periods and in all different manners of storytelling. People never seem to tire of vampires for some reason; to write a popular movie or book these days all you have to do is add them into the mix.
The only thing that Vampire Hunter D. did for me, essentially, was strengthen my hatred of vampires. It's animation is unspectacular, pretty standard for its time. It's story is bearable at best, incredibly confusing at times and in many instances pointless. Don't even get me started on the awful, dated English dub(though I doubt watching the film with subs would have made it any better). However, I digress. I want to talk about Vampire Hunter D. by comparing it to better anime films.
To me Vampire Hunter D., seems somewhat like a failed mixture of Ninja Scroll and the early- and super classy, if I do say so myself- Hayao Miazaki film Lupin the Third: Castle of Cagliostro... but with vampires being the driving point of the plot. As I watched, I couldn't help noticing the similarities between these movies, even though those similarities may seem superficial.
In comparing the film with Ninja Scroll, the presence of supernatural powers and mutants are mutual in both movies. It is a favorite element of anime to have the hero fight a lineup of monsters or deformed bad guys. In Ninja Scroll, however, there was method to the madness- each of the "mutants" serves a certain purpose for testing the main character and he actually learned some from fighting them(when he battles the blind ninja, for example). The villains in the vampire movie were simply there to be one dimensional monsters for the hero to slice through. Vampire Hunter D. boasted one strong-ish female supporting character, the count's daughter- while the main girl fulfilled the need for the whiny damsel in distress; Ninja Scroll had several powerful women characters and even made one a very important element of the film.
Between Vampire Hunter D. and Castle of Cagliostro, it is obvious to see the tried and true plot formula of "evil count captures an innocent girl and the outlaw-type hero figure must save her" in both. The difference is that in Castle of Cagliostro, we see that trite plotline done in a unique and entertaining way, mostly using a loveable cast of well fleshed-out characters, gorgeous animation and great moments of unexpected twists, suspense and action.
Lupin is not the same kind of "silent outcast" character that D. is, but is in fact a mistrusted, often misunderstood character who falls in love with a damsel in distress who he must save from a powerful count as well. D. is very withdrawn and brooding, while Lupin, on the other hand, is spirited, flirtatious and something of a trickster(well, he has to be. He's a thief). Still, they both set out to accomplish their goals with great bravery and skill, and without selfish gain in the end. D. is in a constant struggle with what he is and those around him, making him that iconic misunderstood anti-hero that we're supposed to root for. I found him unlikable, even for all of his heroics, and feel like I've seen a million anime characters just like him, but maybe they actually had a personality somewhere along the line. It must be said that Lupin truly is the more complex character; he changes immensely throughout the film from selfish thief to knight in shining armor. If D. changes any throughout his film he certainly doesn't show it outwardly; he is hardly relateable and just plain uninteresting to watch, even if he is half vampire.
The love interests in both films are borderline bland and needy, but at least Clarisse from Cagliostro tries to save herself on occasion and has an interesting back story, something the lead girl from Vampire Hunter D. genuinely lacks, along with subtlety. I can't even remember the girl from Vampire Hunter D.'s name, whether it was just because she was an unmemorable character or because I honestly wanted to forget who she even was. The way she kept throwing herself at D. was completely tasteless; Clarisse, on the other hand, always acted like a lady and acted to save Lupin when he was vulnerable. Cagliostro also has one strong supporting female character, just as Vampire Hunter D. does, but at least Fujiko both likable and kickass, in contrast to the the vampire count's useless daughter.
And what of the villains? The counts in both movies are powerful and conniving, yet, while the one in Vampire Hunter D. only kidnaps the girl out of boredom(because being a vampire should be boring. Will someone explain to me what's interesting about them again?); the count from Cagliostro does so in order to unite their families' houses and unlock a secret treasure to appease his own greed- it is easy to see that he is by far the better written villain.
It may be unfair to judge these two movies side by side, given that they were about very different thing, but the similarities in plot simply would not stop scratching at my mind; during Vampire Hunter D. I think I was just wishing that I could be watching Castle of Cagliostro instead.
Overall, I assume that the Vampire Hunter D. manga is of better quality based on its stunning art alone. I've flipped through a few of them on the shelves of the Books-a-Million back home and always thought the illustrations were incredible by manga standards. This movie simply fails to impress, at least in my opinion. There may be vampire lovers out there who think otherwise.
Watch this movie instead; it's a classic and angsty vampire-free.
